The Arid West Water Quality Research Project
1997 Conference
April 23-25, 1997
(Selected Conference Materials)
Chemicals of Concern Discussion Group
Chemical Criteria - by Benjamin Parkhurst,
Ph.D.
I. Introduction / Outline
A. What are chemical criteria and how are they used in water
quality management?
1. EPA ambient water quality criteria
2. State water quality standards
3. Site-specific water quality standards
B. Why is this area of research important for arid West ecosystems?
1. Predominance of ephemeral, effluent dominated, and intermittent
waters.
2. Relative value of water in the arid West.
C. Classes of chemicals of concern
1. Conventional parameters
a. Dissolved oxygen
b. Temperature
c. pH
d. Suspended solids
e. Salinity
2. Toxic chemicals
a. Ammonia
b. Chlorine
c. Pesticides
d. Metals
Others
Chemicals of Concern (continued)
11. What are the primary issues?
A. Application to ephemeral, effluent-dominated and intermittent
waters.
1. Definitions of ephemeral, and effluent-dominated, and intermittent
waters.
2. What is different about these waters?
3. Designated use for these waters.
a. Aquatic and wildlife uses
b. Fish consumption
4. Use attainability analyses
a. Policy of independent applicability
b. Weight-of-evidence approaches for measuring use attainability
c. If uses are not being attained, then what are the possible
causes?
i. Chemicals
ii. Other factors
5. Site-specific standards
a. Water effect ratios
b. Application to ephemeral, effluent dominated, and intermittent
waters with limited aquatic communities.
6. Permit Limits
a. Compliance issues
b. Metal partitioning/translator studies
c. Endangered or threatened species
d. Stormwater
Chemical Group Meeting Notes
Session 1: Review of Conference Materials and Identification of
Discussion Areas
As a starting point, the group utilized the initial list of
Chemical Critical/Candidate issues that were provided to the conference
attendees. Dr. Benjamin Parkhurst, President of HAF, Inc. and a
Principal with The Cadmus Group, Inc. of Laramie, Wyoming, led the
discussion group in a review of the list for the purpose of verifying
issues and topics, eliminating issues and adding new topics to the
list. Several key research areas were identified by the group participants
and are summarized below:
1. Specific chemicals primarily are of concern in arid regions
due to differences in designated uses, habitats, hydrology, water
quality, and species for ephemeral, intermittent, and effluent-dependent
waters. Therefore, research is needed to develop methods for deriving
criteria and standards that reflect these differences.
Three water quality parameters that are of broad concern in the
arid West that warrant research are dissolved solids, turbidity
and total suspended solids.
Develop laboratory toxicity data for arid West species for use
in expanding the national database to cover currently underrepresented
species and to develop site-specific criteria, use designations
and toxicity testing protocols.
2. Evaluate the influence of water quality in ephemeral, effluent-dependent
and intermittent waters on site-specific standards. Important constituents
include hardness, alkalinity, TOC, pH, temperature, TSS, and salinity.
3. Develop protocols for implementing hardness-dependent metals
criteria in waters above 400 mg/L CaCO3.
4. Evaluate application of water quality standards to storm flows.
5. Quantify the fate and effects of effluents on groundwater quality.
6. Develop methods for evaluating risk to human health and wildlife
from consumption of aquatic life in ephemeral, effluent-dependent
and intermittent streams, drains, and canals.
7. Conduct an analysis of the standards and permitting process
to determine the most cost-effective ways of developing more appropriate
standards and limits for ephemeral, effluent-dependent and intermittent
waters.
8. Develop protocols for evaluating magnitude, duration, frequency,
and flows in ephemeral and effluent-dependent streams for TMDL,
mixing zone, and effluent limit development purposes
Session 2: Prioritization of Research Areas and Needs
During Session 2, the group reviewed, refined, and prioritized
the list of issues from Session 1. Each research topic was assigned
a ranking of high, moderate or low priority pursuant to the group's
perception of the importance of the research. Budget impact and
fulfilling critical data needs in support of water quality standards
for arid West streams resulted in the following:
High Priority Research/Study Topics
1. Research is needed to define appropriate designated uses, standards,
and permit conditions that reflect the differences in habitats,
hydrology, water quality, and species for ephemeral, intermittent,
and effluent-dependent waters in the arid West. We recommend that
a phased approach be used.
Step one: Conduct an analysis of the standards
and permitting process to determine the most cost effective ways
to developing more appropriate standards and limits for ephemeral,
effluent-dependent and intermittent waters.
Step two: Conduct an analysis of protocols for
evaluating magnitude, duration, frequency, and flows in ephemeral
and effluent-dependent streams for TMDL, mixing zone, and effluent
limit development purposes to determine the most cost-effective
ways of modifying these to develop more appropriate values.
Step three: Design research to address the most
cost effective ways of modifying standards and limits. Specific
research topics may include the following:
- Two water quality parameters that are of broad concern in the
arid West that may warrant research are dissolved solids and total
suspended solids.
- Develop laboratory toxicity data for arid West species for
use in expanding the national database to cover currently underrepresented
species and to develop site-specific criteria, use designations
and toxicity testing protocols.
- Risks of chemicals in these waters to threatened and endangered
species.
2. Develop protocols for implementing hardness-dependent metals
criteria in waters above 400 mg/L CaCO3.
3. Evaluate risks to human health and wildlife from consumption
of aquatic life in ephemeral, effluent-dependent, intermittent streams,
drains and canals.
4. Evaluate the influence of water quality in ephemeral, effluent-dependent
and intermittent waters on site-specific standards. Important constituents
include hardness, alkalinity, TOC, pH, temperature, TSS, mineralogy,
and salinity.
Moderate Priority Research/Study Topics
Quantify and evaluate the fate and effects of effluents on groundwater
and vadose zone quality.
Specific cases:
- Nitrogen species
- TDS
- Others
Low Priority Research/Study Topics
Evaluate application of water quality standards to storm flows.
Session 3: Discussion of Applicability of Research to Revised
Water Quality Standards
The third breakout session for the chemical criteria discussion
group focused on how results from research can and should be employed
by regulatory agencies, such as the EPA, and how to improve regulations
and permitting of water quality in effluent-dependent streams. During
this discussion, the group identified several policy Research/Study
Topics and other recommended activities for improving the applicability
of new research data. These issues were ranked according to their
perceived importance and need.
High Priority Research/Study Topics
1. Sensitivity Analysis of Regulatory Approaches
Research is needed to define appropriate designated uses, standards,
and permit conditions that reflect the differences in habitats,
hydrology, water quality, and species for ephemeral, intermittent,
and effluent-dependent waters in the arid West. The group recommends
that a phased approach be used.
- Step one: Conduct a sensitivity analysis of the process for
determining designated uses, standards and permit limits to determine
the most effective ways for developing more appropriate designated
uses, standards and limits for ephemeral, effluent-dependent and
intermittent waters. This analysis would include reviewing and
evaluating key documents such as the Water Quality Standards Handbook,
Technical Support Document for Water Quality Based Toxin Control,
TMDL Manual, Permit Writers Guide, etc.
- Step two: Conduct an analysis of protocols for evaluating magnitude,
duration, frequency, and flows in ephemeral and effluent-dependent
streams for TMDL, mixing zone, and effluent limit development
purposes to determine the most cost effective ways of modifying
these to develop more appropriate values.
The product of these two steps would be identification of key policy,
regulatory, and research issues that need to be addressed. The workgroup
concluded that many of the critical policy and regulatory issues
would have to be addressed before necessary research for some key
issues could be identified. However, the workgroup identified one
research project that could be used to provide data needed to support
different designated uses, standards, and limits for effluent-dependent
waters in the arid West. This project would evaluate relationships
between water quality and biological communities in effluent-dependent
waters in the arid West. Standardized methods would be used to measure
aquatic and riparian communities, habitat quality, and water quality
in representative samples of effluent-dependent waters throughout
the arid West. The results would be used to characterize these systems
and the relationships between water quality and biological diversity.
It would be used to characterize the ecological benefits of different
levels of water quality in the arid West. The results would be used
to determine if different designated uses, standards, and permit
limits are warranted in the arid West based on both ecological and
cost considerations.
The workgroup also identified some specific research projects that
should be considered that might have broad utility to the arid West,
including the following:
2. The effects of total dissolved solids and turbidity and total
suspended solids on aquatic life.
3. Evaluation of risks of chemicals in these waters to threatened
and endangered species in comparison to risks from other stressors.
4. Develop protocols for implementing hardness-dependent metals
criteria in waters above 400 mg/l CaCO3.
5. Evaluate risks to human health and wildlife from consumption
of aquatic life in ephemeral, effluent-dependent and intermittent
streams, drains and canals.
6. Evaluate the influence of water quality in ephemeral, effluent-dependent
and intermittent waters on site specific standards. Important constituents
include hardness, alkalinity, TOC, pH, temperature, TSS, mineralogy,
and salinity.
7. Quantify/evaluate the fate and effects of effluents on groundwater
and vadose zone quality. Specific cases:
- Nitrogen species
- TDS
- Others
8. Evaluate application of water quality standards to storm flows
Chemical Group Participants
| Name |
Title |
Phone |
Email |
| Antonio, Patrick |
Hydrologist, Navajo NPDES Office,
WindowRock, AZ |
520/871-7185 |
|
| Arnold, Kathy |
Sr. Project Engineer, ASARCO Mining,
Tucson, AZ |
520/798-7738 |
karnold@asarco.com |
| Baumgartner, Don |
Director, Env. Research Lab, Univ.
of AZ, Tucson,AZ |
520/741-1900 |
donb@ag.arizona.edu |
| Boadway, Debbie |
Proj Engineer, County Sanit.Dist.
of Los Angeles, CA |
562/699-7411 |
dboadway@lacsd. |
| Caporaso, Mike |
Water Resource Specialist, AZ Dept
Water Resources, Tucson, AZ |
520/770-3806 |
|
| Card, Victoria |
Env. Program Admin, Colorado Springs
Utilities, CO |
719/448-4463 |
|
| Curry, Tom |
Environmental Administrator, Central
AZ Project, Phx |
602/870-2353 |
|
| Dahl, Jon |
Sr. Environmental Scientist, SAIC,
Phoenix, AZ |
602/955-5311 |
dahlj@cpva.saic.com |
| Eurick, Glenn |
Env. Dir, US Barrick Gold Co., Salt
Lake City, UT |
801/539-0660 |
geurick@apelon.net |
| Fox, Peter |
Associate.Professor AZ State Univ,
Tempe, AZ |
602/965-1734 |
Peter.Fox@asu.edu |
| Graham, David |
Hydrologist, USGS Water Resources,
Tucson, AZ |
520/670-6671 |
ddgraham@usgs.gov |
| Hogrefe, Robert |
Pretreatment Manager., City of Albuquerque,
NM |
505/873-7030 |
Rhogrefe@cabq.gov |
| Hood, Wayne |
Manager, AZ Dept of Environmental
Quality, Phx, AZ |
602/207-4416 |
|
| Jefferson, Tom |
Water Quality Engineering Manager,
Tucson Water, |
520/791-5256 |
|
| Luey, Jim |
Environmental Scientist, EPA Region
8, Denver, CO |
303/312-6791 |
|
| Melillo, Jean |
Environmental Scientist, Tucson
Water, Tucson |
520/791-5256 |
|
| Morea, Susan |
Principal, Camp Dresser McKee, Denver,
CO |
303/298-1311 |
Moreasc@cdm.com |
| Neher, Mike |
Chief, Utility Operations,City of
Henderson, NV |
702/565-2048 |
|
| Norried, Warren |
Water Resources Engineer, Coachella
Valley Water District, Coachella, CA |
619/398-2651 |
|
| Oleszkiewicz, Jan |
Professor, Env. Eng.Dept., San Diego
State Univ. |
619/594-6071 |
joleszki@mai.sdsu.edu |
| Papelis, Lambis |
Asst Research Professor., Desert
Research Institute, Las Vegas, NV |
702/895-0453 |
|
| Purcell, Tom |
Sr VP-Science-The Silver Council,
Chevy Chase, MD |
301/664-5150 |
PurcellT@aol.com |
| Rattas, Steve |
Environmental Specialist, Central
AZ Project, Phoenix |
602/870-2225 |
|
| Santantonio, Dan |
Regulatory Compliance Officer,City
Las Cruces, NM |
505/528-3548 |
|
| Smith, Clint |
Sr.Project Manager, Cella Barr Assoc.,
Tucson, AZ |
520/750-7474 |
tucson@callabarr.com |
| Stark, Glenn |
Proj. Mgr, Gila River Indian Community,
Sacaton, AZ |
520/562-3203 |
|
| Stroup, Doug |
Env. Program Mgr, Maricopa County
Flood Control District, Phoenix, AZ |
602/506-8127 |
|
| Watkins, John |
Pretreatment Officer, City of Glendale,
AZ |
|
|
| Yrrizarry, Jesus |
Env Coordinator, Cyprus Sierrita
Corp. Green Vly, AZ |
520/648-8667 |
|
| Zikmund, Kim |
Hydrologist |
702/258-3926 |
|
Top of Page / Previous
Page / Next Page / Table
of Contents
|